Navigation Links
Study explores effects of review setting on scientific peer review
Date:8/7/2013

RESTON, VIRGINIA Research findings published today in PLOS ONE report that the setting in which a scientific peer review panel evaluates grant applications does not necessarily impact the outcome of the review process. However, the research found that the average amount of discussion panelists engage in during the review is reduced. The investigation examined more than 1,600 grant application reviews coordinated by the American Institute of Biological Sciences Scientific Peer Advisory and Review Services (AIBS SPARS) on behalf of a federal agency over a four-year period.

The researchers compared two years when grant applications were reviewed using an in-person peer review panel to two years when panels were conducted via teleconference or videoconference.

Funding organizations routinely bring experts together to review research grant applications. A process known as scientific peer review, the goal of these panels is to identify the best research applications.

"There are no studies exploring whether the review setting significantly alters the quality of the peer review process," stated Dr. Stephen Gallo, the lead author of this study and Technical Operations Manager for AIBS SPARS.

"Our goal is always a reliable and high-quality peer-review process. It is important that we understand the strengths and weaknesses of different peer review methods," said Scott Glisson, Director of AIBS SPARS and an author of this study.

The findings appear in "Teleconference Versus Face-To-Face Scientific Peer Review of Grant Applications: Effects on Review Outcomes" published in PLOS ONE.

"Little difference was found in most of the review metrics between face-to-face and teleconference settings," said Gallo. Application scoring was only modestly affected and reviewers used the full scoring range regardless of review setting. The reviewer ratings were highly reliable in both settings.

Often, the greatest anticipated difference between in-person and teleconference panels is the amount of time allocated to discussing applications. This study found teleconference or videoconference panels allocated less time to application discussions than in-person panels.

"This is a first of its kind study that provides valuable data to help research program managers select appropriate models for conducting peer review," said Glisson.

More research is needed. "We should know whether the reduced amount of discussion and peripheral interactions that occur in a teleconference setting influence the final panel outcomes, and, ultimately the productivity of the research that is funded," said Gallo.


'/>"/>

Contact: Robert Gropp
rgropp@aibs.org
202-628-1500 x250
American Institute of Biological Sciences
Source:Eurekalert

Related biology news :

1. Women in urban areas show high rates of postpartum depression, study finds
2. Study questions natures ability to self-correct climate change
3. UCSB study finds climate change is causing modifications to marine life behavior
4. Study reveals potential role of love hormone oxytocin in brain function
5. Mount Sinai researchers develop first successful laboratory model for studying hepatitis C
6. Study finds physicians need to better recognize use of herbal supplements while breastfeeding
7. Study highlights possible new approach to prostate cancer treatment
8. Breath analysis reliably indicates presence, level of infection in mice, UCI study finds
9. Southerners are less trusting, but trust is a factor in environmental cooperation, study shows
10. Study investigates extraordinary trout with tolerance to heavily polluted water
11. Extinct ancient ape did not walk like a human, study shows
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:4/13/2017)... , April 13, 2017 UBM,s Advanced Design ... will feature emerging and evolving technology through its ... Summits will run alongside the expo portion of the ... panels and demonstrations focused on trending topics within 3D ... design and manufacturing event will take place June 13-15, 2017 ...
(Date:4/11/2017)... , April 11, 2017 NXT-ID, ... security technology company, announces the appointment of independent Directors Mr. ... to its Board of Directors, furthering the company,s corporate ... ... NXT-ID, we look forward to their guidance and benefiting from ...
(Date:4/4/2017)... 2017   EyeLock LLC , a leader of ... States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued U.S. ... of an iris image with a face image acquired ... company,s 45 th issued patent. ... given the multi-modal biometric capabilities that have recently come ...
Breaking Biology News(10 mins):
(Date:6/23/2017)... ... June 23, 2017 , ... The ... hobbyists, and the University Aviation Association (UAA), the unifying voice for collegiate aviation ... Challenge will encourage teamwork, competition, and success through a STEM-based education platform. , ...
(Date:6/22/2017)... ... June 22, 2017 , ... ... specialists DST Diagnostische Systeme & Technologien GmbH, thereby expanding its product portfolio to ... from hay fever, urticaria, asthma, atopic eczema or a food allergy. Allergies are ...
(Date:6/22/2017)... ... 22, 2017 , ... The first human cell line HeLa, established in 1951, ... on cross-contamination of human cell lines with HeLa cells were published. Until recently, cross-contamination ... labs and is associated with dramatic consequences for research. , In this educational ...
(Date:6/20/2017)... ... 20, 2017 , ... Biologist Dawn Maslar MS has found a biomarker that ... Chase, Women Choose: The Neuroscience of Meeting, Dating, Losing Your Mind, and Finding True ... ”The logical next step, in my estimation, was to scientifically track the evidence of ...
Breaking Biology Technology: