Navigation Links
Study explores effects of review setting on scientific peer review
Date:8/7/2013

RESTON, VIRGINIA Research findings published today in PLOS ONE report that the setting in which a scientific peer review panel evaluates grant applications does not necessarily impact the outcome of the review process. However, the research found that the average amount of discussion panelists engage in during the review is reduced. The investigation examined more than 1,600 grant application reviews coordinated by the American Institute of Biological Sciences Scientific Peer Advisory and Review Services (AIBS SPARS) on behalf of a federal agency over a four-year period.

The researchers compared two years when grant applications were reviewed using an in-person peer review panel to two years when panels were conducted via teleconference or videoconference.

Funding organizations routinely bring experts together to review research grant applications. A process known as scientific peer review, the goal of these panels is to identify the best research applications.

"There are no studies exploring whether the review setting significantly alters the quality of the peer review process," stated Dr. Stephen Gallo, the lead author of this study and Technical Operations Manager for AIBS SPARS.

"Our goal is always a reliable and high-quality peer-review process. It is important that we understand the strengths and weaknesses of different peer review methods," said Scott Glisson, Director of AIBS SPARS and an author of this study.

The findings appear in "Teleconference Versus Face-To-Face Scientific Peer Review of Grant Applications: Effects on Review Outcomes" published in PLOS ONE.

"Little difference was found in most of the review metrics between face-to-face and teleconference settings," said Gallo. Application scoring was only modestly affected and reviewers used the full scoring range regardless of review setting. The reviewer ratings were highly reliable in both settings.

Often, the greatest anticipated difference between in-person and teleconference panels is the amount of time allocated to discussing applications. This study found teleconference or videoconference panels allocated less time to application discussions than in-person panels.

"This is a first of its kind study that provides valuable data to help research program managers select appropriate models for conducting peer review," said Glisson.

More research is needed. "We should know whether the reduced amount of discussion and peripheral interactions that occur in a teleconference setting influence the final panel outcomes, and, ultimately the productivity of the research that is funded," said Gallo.


'/>"/>

Contact: Robert Gropp
rgropp@aibs.org
202-628-1500 x250
American Institute of Biological Sciences
Source:Eurekalert

Related biology news :

1. Women in urban areas show high rates of postpartum depression, study finds
2. Study questions natures ability to self-correct climate change
3. UCSB study finds climate change is causing modifications to marine life behavior
4. Study reveals potential role of love hormone oxytocin in brain function
5. Mount Sinai researchers develop first successful laboratory model for studying hepatitis C
6. Study finds physicians need to better recognize use of herbal supplements while breastfeeding
7. Study highlights possible new approach to prostate cancer treatment
8. Breath analysis reliably indicates presence, level of infection in mice, UCI study finds
9. Southerners are less trusting, but trust is a factor in environmental cooperation, study shows
10. Study investigates extraordinary trout with tolerance to heavily polluted water
11. Extinct ancient ape did not walk like a human, study shows
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:3/6/2017)... SAN MATEO, Calif. , March 6, 2017 ... predictive marketing and sales technology, today announced Predictive ... (AI) solution for infusing actionable sales intelligence into ... customers to automatically enable their sales organizations with ... contextual messages that allow for intelligent engagement. Predictive ...
(Date:3/1/2017)...  Aware, Inc. (NASDAQ: AWRE), a leading supplier of ... Moberg has resigned, effective March 3, 2017, as ... and Treasurer of Aware citing a desire to retire.  ... of the Board of Directors of Aware. ... and co-President, General Counsel has been named Chief Executive ...
(Date:2/26/2017)... Feb. 25, 2017  Securus Technologies, a leading ... for public safety, investigation, corrections and monitoring, announces ... Reentry. "Too often, too many offenders ... county jails are trying to tackle this ongoing ... friends and family members. While significant steps are underway, ...
Breaking Biology News(10 mins):
(Date:3/22/2017)...   Invitae Corporation (NYSE: NVTA), one ... announced the availability of a new genetic test ... (SMA) , a neuromuscular disease that is one ... as well as a significant cause of progressive ... during the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) ...
(Date:3/20/2017)... ... March 20, 2017 , ... ... of endogenous hormones to regulate homeostasis via their cognate nuclear receptors. By ... adverse reproductive, neurological, proliferative, and immunological disorders. EDC exposure can occur directly, ...
(Date:3/20/2017)... ... March 20, 2017 , ... ... disorders, today announced that it has entered into an exclusive global license agreement ... bowel disease including Necrotizing Enterocolitis (rare orphan disease) as well as Crohn’s Disease ...
(Date:3/20/2017)... ... March 20, 2017 , ... Charm Sciences, Inc. ... play system that counts Peel Plate microbial test colonies, stores plate images, exports ... unit has an internal computer, and is accurate within 10% of an experienced ...
Breaking Biology Technology: