Navigation Links
Reliability of neuroscience research questioned
Date:4/10/2013

New research has questioned the reliability of neuroscience studies, saying that conclusions could be misleading due to small sample sizes.

A team led by academics from the University of Bristol reviewed 48 articles on neuroscience meta-analysis which were published in 2011 and concluded that most had an average power of around 20 per cent a finding which means the chance of the average study discovering the effect being investigated is only one in five.

The paper, being published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience today [10 April], reveals that small, low-powered studies are 'endemic' in neuroscience, producing unreliable research which is inefficient and wasteful.

It focuses on how low statistical power caused by low sample size of studies, small effects being investigated, or both can be misleading and produce more false scientific claims than high-powered studies.

It also illustrates how low power reduces a study's ability to detect any effects, and shows that when discoveries are claimed, they are more likely to be false or misleading.

The paper claims there is substantial evidence that a large proportion of research published in scientific literature may be unreliable as a consequence.

Another consequence is that the findings are overestimated because smaller studies consistently give more positive results than larger studies. This was found to be the case for studies using a diverse range of methods, including brain imaging, genetics and animal studies.

Kate Button, from the School of Social and Community Medicine, and Marcus Munaf, from the School of Experimental Psychology, led a team of researchers from Stanford University, the University of Virginia and the University of Oxford.

She said: "There's a lot of interest at the moment in improving the reliability of science. We looked at neuroscience literature and found that, on average, studies had only around a 20 per cent chance of detecting the effects they were investigating, even if the effects are real. This has two important implications - many studies lack the ability to give definitive answers to the questions they are testing, and many claimed findings are likely to be incorrect or unreliable."

The study concludes that improving the standard of results in neuroscience, and enabling them to be more easily reproduced, is a key priority and requires attention to well-established methodological principles.

It recommends that existing scientific practices can be improved with small changes or additions to methodologies, such as acknowledging any limitations in the interpretation of results; disclosing methods and findings transparently; and working collaboratively to increase the total sample size and power.


'/>"/>

Contact: Philippa Walker
philippa.walker@bristol.ac.uk
44-117-928-7777
University of Bristol
Source:Eurekalert

Related biology news :

1. University of Minnesota invention helps advance reliability of alternative energy
2. The neuroscience of finding your lost keys
3. Scripps Florida scientist awarded prestigious Javits Neuroscience Investigator Award
4. RayBiotech, Inc. Executes Neuroscience Biomarker Master Services Agreement with Banner Sun Health Research Institute
5. Neuroscience: The extraordinary ease of ordinal series
6. Media registration opens for Neuroscience 2012, worlds largest brain science meeting
7. Wiring bats for neuroscience research
8. UCSF pair win Gruber Foundation Neuroscience prize
9. 6th Annual Canadian Neuroscience Meeting, Vancouver, May 20-23, 2012
10. Stanford and MIT scientists win Perl-UNC Neuroscience prize
11. Measuring microbes makes wetland health monitoring more affordable, says MU researcher
Post Your Comments:
*Name:
*Comment:
*Email:
(Date:5/26/2020)... ... May 26, 2020 , ... ... software solutions for biopharmaceutical R&D, today announced that Gritstone Oncology, Inc., a ... (TCR)-mimetic bispecific T cell engagers and TCR-based therapeutics, has implemented Genedata ...
(Date:5/21/2020)... Ariz. (PRWEB) , ... May 20, 2020 , ... Law ... and remove danger for all of us. The positions of these men and women ... from the defense for not following rules precisely. Officers have always had to face ...
(Date:5/14/2020)... ALPHARETTA, Ga. (PRWEB) , ... May 14, 2020 ... ... ), a job board for medical sales representatives, found the 2019 average medical ... encouraging 2020 findings risk being shadowed by uncertainties amid the COVID-19 global crisis. ...
Breaking Biology News(10 mins):
(Date:6/23/2020)... ... June 23, 2020 , ... DeCurtis Corporation, the premier provider ... Derek Fournier has been appointed CEO and President. Founder and former CEO, David ... , “DeCurtis Corporation has been on an incredible journey for the last twenty ...
(Date:6/23/2020)... YORK (PRWEB) , ... June 22, 2020 , ... ... its lead glutamine antagonist, DRP-104, will be presented June 22-24 during the American ... effects of DRP-104; and, the other profiles the potent, consistent single agent activity ...
(Date:6/19/2020)... ... June 18, 2020 , ... The Vitaspace ... is to join forces to radically prolong life and find a way (medicine or ... period. This project was supported by various scientists from all over the world, doctors, ...
(Date:6/11/2020)... ... June 09, 2020 , ... PathSensors Inc., a Baltimore ... Innovation Research (SBIR) program funded by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture ... Field”. The project’s goal was to engineer and develop a field-deployable instrument for ...
Breaking Biology Technology: